STONEZONE NEWS

The chandeliered ballrooms of diplomacy and statecraft often conceal another theater entirely beneath their polished marble floors and crimson carpets. It is the theater of propaganda, insinuation, character assassination, and media malfeasance where partisan television personalities masquerade as journalists while multinational corporate advertisers finance the spectacle like decadent Roman aristocrats funding gladiatorial bloodsport. This week, America witnessed yet another vulgar exhibition of that corruption as Jen Psaki and the floundering propaganda apparatus formerly known as MSNBC attempted to transform Eric Trump’s family trip to Communist China into a feverish morality play stitched together with conjecture, innuendo, semantic distortion, and ideological venom.

Eric Trump’s blistering denunciation of Psaki and her employer was not merely a defense of his own reputation. It was an indictment of an entire diseased ecosystem of corporate media that now survives almost exclusively on deception, outrage merchandising, and anti-Trump hysteria. The modern left wing television apparatus no longer resembles journalism in any recognizable form. It resembles a carnival mirror maze where facts are bent, enlarged, twisted, and mutilated until truth itself becomes unrecognizable. The objective is not illumination. The objective is contamination.

Psaki’s attempt to portray Eric Trump as secretly entangled in shadowy Chinese business dealings rested largely on linguistic sleight of hand worthy of a third rate confidence artist operating a shell game on a decrepit Atlantic City boardwalk. Securities filings reportedly identified Eric Trump as a “board observer” connected to ALT5 Sigma. Psaki and her network inflated that description into the far more inflammatory implication of formal board membership and direct operational involvement. That distinction is not trivial. It is the difference between observation and governance, between proximity and participation, between smoke and actual fire.

The corporate media has become addicted to these distortions because its economic survival depends upon them. Networks like MS NOW hemorrhage credibility, ratings, and public trust with the velocity of a breached oil tanker hemorrhaging crude into the sea. Their audiences continue to shrink because millions of Americans have recognized that these organizations function less like newsrooms and more like ideological monasteries where political orthodoxy is enforced with religious fanaticism. The anchors, contributors, and executives exist inside a hermetically sealed echo chamber marinated in contempt for ordinary Americans, particularly those who support President Donald Trump.

Even more grotesque is the role played by the advertisers who continue financing this machinery of misinformation. Massive corporations spend millions underwriting broadcasts that traffic in insinuation and reputational sabotage while simultaneously lecturing Americans about ethics, democracy, and social responsibility. Their advertisements are the oxygen sustaining this infernal furnace of disinformation. Every commercial break serves as another corporate seal of approval stamped upon the degradation of honest journalism.

Eric Trump stated publicly that he accompanied his father to China as a son, not as a businessman. While President Trump engaged in high stakes negotiations with Xi Jinping over trade, technology, artificial intelligence infrastructure, tariffs, and the geopolitical future of the Pacific, Eric and Lara Trump reportedly toured the Great Wall of China. Yet the media vultures circled overhead searching desperately for scandal because scandal has become the only currency left in their collapsing empire.

This entire episode exposes the malignant transformation of modern corporate journalism into something resembling a political intelligence operation rather than an independent press. The objective is perpetual narrative warfare. Facts are no longer assembled carefully like stones in a cathedral. They are weaponized like shards of broken glass hurled at political adversaries. Context is discarded. Precision is abandoned. Retractions arrive quietly if they arrive at all, buried beneath the rubble after the reputational explosion has already detonated across social media and cable news.

The irony is staggering. The very same media figures who spent years screaming about “misinformation” now routinely engage in embellishment, selective omission, semantic manipulation, and partisan editorializing disguised as factual reporting. They accuse others of poisoning democracy while they themselves pump intellectual toxins into the bloodstream of the republic every night before a glowing camera lens.

America deserves a press corps capable of sobriety, fairness, precision, and integrity. Instead, much of the nation has inherited a decadent infotainment aristocracy whose relationship with truth resembles a compulsive gambler’s relationship with money. Temporary, transactional, and catastrophically irresponsible. Jen Psaki’s performance was not an isolated mistake. It was another symptom of a broader institutional rot consuming the legacy media establishment from within like termites hollowing out the beams of a once grand cathedral until only a collapsing façade remains standing.

As Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard was one of the most courageous and effective public servants in modern American history. A combat veteran and former Democratic Congresswoman who wisely converted to MAGA Republican, she dedicated her time in the Trump administration to challenging the entrenched powers that have undermined our republic. 

On Friday, Gabbard announced her resignation, effective June 30, sharing the tragic news that her husband, Abraham, was recently diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer. In her statement, Gabbard emphasized the need to step away from public service to stand by his side as he faces the fight of his life in the coming weeks and months. In these trying times, her family deserves our deepest prayers and unwavering support. Though she is stepping down, Gabbard is not likely to depart from public life forever—she remains a rising star who will undoubtedly be part of the Republican Party’s future.

Gabbard’s journey to the apex of the American intelligence apparatus was remarkable. A staunch supporter of civil liberties, she came into her role as DNI as the consummate outsider. The permanent bureaucracy had her in their crosshairs from the outset. Unlike career insiders beholden to the system, Gabbard brought a healthy level of skepticism along with a veteran’s discipline to the role. She emerged as the most focused and unrelenting opponent of the institutional enemies of Donald Trump and the American people.

As DNI, Gabbard aggressively pursued declassification of long-hidden records, shining a light on decades of potential abuses. This included renewed efforts on documents related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the infamous MKUltra program. When reports surfaced of these records being seized from ODNI custody amid these reviews—allegations amplified by figures like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and a CIA whistleblower before the U.S. Senate—the public finally saw a glimpse of the intense internal resistance she faced.

On Russia-gate, Gabbard’s work proved transformative. She declassified documents revealing that the conspiracy to frame President Trump as a Russian asset originated at the highest levels, with direct involvement from Barack Hussein Obama. Materials showed a December 2016 National Security Council meeting where faulty intelligence assessments were pushed despite contrary evidence. Officials like John Brennan, James Comey, and James Clapper knowingly advanced narratives that were later proven baseless against the recommendation of veteran intelligence analysts. These releases provided the evidentiary foundation for accountability that previous DNI leaders, such as current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, had withheld. Gabbard’s actions busted up the deep state’s institutional protection racket.

Gabbard’s oversight efforts extended to the stolen 2020 presidential election. Gabbard personally appeared in Fulton County, Georgia—a crucial Democrat fraud center—to oversee the FBI’s raid taking election documents for investigation. Additionally, Gabbard released explosive documents exposing the first Trump impeachment as a fraud, revealing how Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson bypassed proper procedures, relying on second-hand, fabricated testimony regarding Trump’s call with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky. 

Gabbard took decisive action by revoking security clearances from dozens of Obama and Biden-era officials whose intense ideological bias made them potential national security threats. This move targeted those who abused public trust and helped further conspiracies to destroy President Trump. Predictably, it triggered media outrage from outlets like the New York Times and Axios, which claimed—absurdly—that her decisions hampered investigations. As legal experts have noted, revoked clearances do not erase knowledge or prevent testimony during trials. The real obstruction lies with craven, compromised prosecutors, not Gabbard’s reforms.

None of this came without personal and professional cost. Gabbard endured relentless persecution from intelligence bureaucrats desperate to protect their fiefdoms, constant media scrutiny, and attacks from both the left and certain neoconservative corners. She became a primary scapegoat for those in the tank of the military-industrial complex. Neoconservative Senator Tom Cotton’s proposed legislation to slash ODNI staff by nearly half exemplified this resistance. While Gabbard supported measured reforms to trim bureaucracy by about 25 percent, Cotton’s efforts meant to cripple oversight of the intelligence community under the guise of enhancing government efficiency..

Critics questioned her loyalty over past meetings with foreign leaders or her opposition to endless regime-change wars. These attacks ignored her distinguished service in the Hawaii Army National Guard, including a combat tour in Iraq. Gabbard’s skepticism of military adventurism stemmed from firsthand experience. She saw the horrors of war first hand and does not want her fellow military servicemen and women to be deployed unless absolutely necessary and never in a Bush-style forever war. Gabbard’s independent streak made her uniquely qualified for the position.

As Gabbard leaves Washington D.C. to care for her husband during his cancer battle, her work must continue in spirit and through dedicated successors. America’s intelligence apparatus still requires sustained, competent reform. Deep state resistance—evident in the obstruction of the declassification process, staff-slashing proposals by disingenuous neocons, and pathetic smear campaigns from the fake news—proves the battle rages on. If her efforts are squandered, the deep state will win, and the MAGA legacy of restoring accountable government will fall into jeopardy. We cannot replace her laser-focused competence with mere tough talkers who might go on Fox News and read a script of carefully-prepared talking points but fail to deliver. MAGA demands leaders who execute with the same precision and courage Gabbard demonstrated.

Her accomplishments on unearthing truths regarding Russia-gate, the stolen 2020 presidential election, the first sham impeachment coup against President Trump, and historical abuses like MKUltra laid critical groundwork. Replacing her without honoring that foundation risks allowing entrenched powers to regroup. Nearly a year and a half into Trump’s second term, meaningful accountability for systemic federal crimes has yet to be fully achieved. Gabbard supplied the documentation; the system must now act decisively. Without Gabbard serving as a bulldog within the system, agencies weaponized under previous administrations could evade reform.

Gabbard represented something rare: a true institutional skeptic wielding power to constrain institutions. She declassified far more than her predecessors, confronted sacred cows without blinking, and prioritized American interests over the feelings of sniveling bureaucrats. Forces aligned against her understood that her success threatened their influence. Our nation endured an invisible struggle within the national security state. At its center was Tulsi Gabbard, a true patriot who put country first and never buckled. Her work—rooting out politicization, exposing frauds, and restoring oversight—must continue in perpetuity after she officially departs from her role. Only through such commitment can the deep state be defanged and the republic restored. American freedom and the MAGA legacy depend on it.

President Donald J. Trump is charting a clear, America First course on Iran. In his statements posted on his Truth Social platform, President Trump dismantled the failures of the past while outlining a superior path forward.

He said: “One of the worst deals ever made by our Country was the Iran Nuclear Deal, put forth and signed into existence by Barack Hussein Obama… It was a direct path to Iran developing a Nuclear Weapon. Not so with the transaction currently being negotiated with Iran by the Trump Administration – THE EXACT OPPOSITE, in fact! The negotiations are proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner, and I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side. The Blockade will remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached… There can be no mistakes! … I would like to thank… all of the countries of the Middle East for their support… perhaps the Islamic Republic of Iran would like to join [the Abraham Accords], as well!” 

President Trump followed this with extensive diplomatic outreach, speaking to leaders from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The result: a memorandum of understanding for peace, with the Strait of Hormuz reopening under controlled terms that prevent nuclear breakout. This is diplomacy from strength—blockade intact, red lines firm, regional realignment possible. President Trump is delivering results without endless American entanglement.

Yet two prominent neoconservative senators who now claim to be staunch allies to the President, Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, are expressing deep skepticism. Their support for President Trump appears conditional—tied not to his proven record of putting America First, but to whether he advances their preferred posture of prolonged confrontation for the military-industrial complex. 

Senator Ted Cruz wrote in an X post: “I am deeply concerned about what we are hearing about an Iran ‘deal,’ being pushed by some voices in the administration. President Trump’s decision to strike Iran was the most consequential decision of his second term. He was right to do so… If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant ‘death to America’—now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake.”

Cruz’s warnings disingenuously frame any negotiated off-ramp as surrender. But this overlooks President Trump’s explicit rejection of the Obama deal and his insistence on verifiable dismantling of enrichment capabilities. President Trump understands the Islamist regime’s hostility. Yet he also grasps that perpetual military operations drain American resources while China and other adversaries expand their hegemony in the world. President Trump’s approach—military success leveraged into negotiations—is pragmatic, transactional, and effective, a substantial departure from the “protecting democracy” rationale that became a laughable joke during the failed Bush era.

Senator Lindsey Graham echoed similar doubts on President Trump’s ability to make a deal. He wrote in an X post: “If a deal is struck to end the Iranian conflict because it is believed that the Strait of Hormuz cannot be protected from Iranian terrorism and Iran still possesses the capability to destroy major Gulf oil infrastructure, then Iran will be perceived as being a dominate force requiring a diplomatic solution. This combination… is a major shift of the balance of power in the region and over time will be a nightmare for Israel… I personally am a skeptic of the idea that Iran cannot be denied the ability to terrorize the Strait.”

Graham, always the consummate brownnoser, acknowledged the potential brilliance of President Trump expanding the Abraham Accords but conditions his approval on maximalist terms meant to elongate the conflict. His focus on Israeli outcomes highlights a recurring neocon tendency: subordinating American strategic autonomy to the preferences of foreigners. President Trump, by contrast, pursues deals that benefit America first. President Trump is far too smart to be co-opted by the neocon War Party. He recognizes when Israeli or allied priorities diverge from American ones and always acts decisively in our interest. His agenda is to secure peace through strength without forever wars.

It must be remembered that many prominent neocons were the people who were the most outrageously anti-Trump after he came down the golden elevator and tipped over the GOP establishment’s applecart. During the 2016 primaries, Cruz repeatedly attacked Trump as a “pathological liar,” a “sniveling coward,” a “big, loud New York bully,” and “utterly amoral.” He refused to endorse President Trump at the Republican National Convention, urging voters to follow their conscience. Graham was even harsher, calling Trump a “race-baiting, xenophobic religious bigot” and declaring, “You know how you make America great again? Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.”

These senators now position themselves as President Trump’s supporters, but their criticisms reveal the conditional nature of their loyalty. They back President Trump when they feel he aligns with military interventionism, but when President Trump achieves peace in the Middle East, they push back. It shows that they do not really trust President Trump. They see him as a means to an end. This is seen throughout the entire neocon spectrum. ‘Journalist’ Laura Loomer even took to X claiming that President Trump could not bring Islam to heel under any circumstances, a ridiculous notion that paints the President as a weak leader.

Loomer said: “People are going to be jolted when they realize there’s no such thing as a peace deal with a Muslim country. Islamic countries, especially the Islamic Republic of Iran, don’t believe in peace, because Islam is inherently violent and focuses on conquering and killing all non Muslims. No peace deal with any Muslim country will ever be fruitful long term because Islam is inherently violent.”

Loomer’s comments expose her lack of belief in President Trump’s ability to make deals. The grotesque Rocky Dennis ringer thinks in her deranged mind that President Trump is powerless to cut a deal that could ever compel compliance or behavioral change from Iranians. President Trump rejects this defeatism. Through maximum pressure, targeted strikes, and diplomatic leverage, he will ensure the Iranian regime complies with red lines on nuclear weapons. His blockade, military successes in degrading Iran’s capabilities, and outreach to Sunni states create the conditions for verifiable restraint. Trump has consistently shown he can handle radical Islam: destroying ISIS, eliminating Soleimani, and deterring aggression without quagmires. President Trump’s strategy demonstrates superior wisdom. He thanks regional leaders for cooperation and leaves the door open for Iran to join broader peace if it abandons nuclear ambitions. This is not weakness—it is strength calibrated to avoid the trillions wasted and lives lost in previous Middle East adventures. 

American interests with Israel remain strong—as they are truly among our greatest allies and the Lord shines His favor down upon us for our support for Israel—but our interests are not always identical. Remember Netanyahu’s swift congratulations to Biden, helping to legitimize the vacuous puppet after the stolen election of 2020, that allies can diverge, and sometimes even your closest allies can let you down when you need them the most. President Trump rightly says “no” when necessary even if it might draw the ire of Netanyahu and hard-line Israeli conservatives.

The American people elected President Trump to end nation-building and endless wars, not extend them under new management. Cruz and Graham’s concerns reflect an outdated mindset that President Trump has repeatedly outmaneuvered. In 2016, the public supported President Trump as their champion and rejected Cruz and Graham, for a reason. The public trusts President Trump to finalize a deal that prevents a nuclear Iran, reopens critical shipping lanes, expands normalization, and brings troops home when the job is done. President Trump’s results will speak louder than the shrieks of the pro-war panickans.

STONEZONE LIVE!

WEAPONIZATION FUND

WEAPONIZATION FUND

WEAPONIZATION FUND Trump Advisor @MichaelRCaputo Joins The StoneZONE on 77WABC Radio to Discuss the “Weaponization Fund” — Aimed at Helping Victims of Political Lawfare Listen LIVE 8 PM ET: http://WABCRadio.com

PLAY >>>

ROGER STONE MEDIA

WHO IS ROGER STONE?

Roger Stone is a seasoned political operative, speaker, pundit, and New York Times Bestselling Author featured in the Netflix documentary Get Me Roger Stone.

Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump—all of these Presidents relied on Roger Stone to secure their seat in the Oval Office. In a 45-year career in American politics, Stone has worked on over 700 campaigns for public office.

“Roger’s a good guy. He is a patriot and believes in a strong nation, and a lot of other things I believes in.”

– President Donald J. Trump
Stone’s bestselling books include The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJThe Bush Crime FamilyThe Clintons’ War on WomenThe Making of The President—How Donald Trump Orchestrated a Revolution, and Stone’s Rules with a forward by Tucker Carlson.
For the last 15 years, Roger Stone has published his International Best & Worst Dressed List. Stone is considered an authority on political and corporate strategy, branding, marketing, messaging, and advertising.
Stone is the host of The StoneZONE on Rumble and is also the host of The Roger Stone Show on WABC Radio.

Stay Informed with Exclusive Updates!

Subscribe for FREE to STONEZONE